Just a moment, the page is loading...
Browse All Studies
View List of Selected Studies and choose next steps >
Clear All Studies
Close
Login | Create Account
About Us
Data Sponsors
For Researchers ▼
Researchers Perspective
How It Works
Data Sharing Agreement
FAQs
Independent Review Panel
Metrics ▼
Metrics Overview
Agreed Proposals
Published Proposals
Help/Contact Us
Assessing the difference in results of aggregate data meta-analysis and individual patient data meta-analysis
Proposal
2082
Title of Proposed Research
Assessing the difference in results of aggregate data meta-analysis and individual patient data meta-analysis
Lead Researcher
Diwakar Jha
Affiliation
Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra
Funding Source
None
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Data Sharing Agreement Date
01 January 0001
Lay Summary
There are extensive discussions about the relative merits of performing individual-patient level data (IPD) analysis versus meta-analysis (MA) in those cases where IPD are accessible. Some favor IPD and others favor MA. This study envisages to find the difference in outputs when IPD analysis is done in comparison to standard meta-analysisWhen multiple trials are available for intervention against a standard comparator, it is very difficult to arrive at a single point estimate for the efficacy of the intervention. This research will help us to establish IPD meta-analysis as a tool to establish a point estimate for already existing heterogenous data. Although meta-analysis is widely used to pool aggregate data, there are evidences that pooling of individual patient data might be a more robust method. Our research envisages to further explore this finding. The findings from this study can help us to make more informed decisions regarding the efficacy of an intervention and lead to improvement in patient care.The findings from this study will help to establish IPD meta-analysis as a robust tool to pool data from multiple trials for an intervention. The potential of IPD meta-analysis as a tool to arrive at a point estimate for a heterogenous data can be established.
Study Data Provided
[{ "PostingID": 45, "Title": "GSK-ADC112355", "Description": "A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, 16-Week Study to Evaluate the Effect of Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol DISKUS® 250/50mcg BID and Placebo on Arterial Stiffness in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)" },{ "PostingID": 1806, "Title": "GSK-SCA100223", "Description": "A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose, 8-Week Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Lamotrigine in the Treatment of Depression in Patients with Type II Bipolar Disorder" },{ "PostingID": 1807, "Title": "GSK-SCA30924", "Description": "Double blind placebo controlled study of lamictal in acute bipolar depression" },{ "PostingID": 1826, "Title": "GSK-SCA40910", "Description": "A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Evaluation of the Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of LAMICTAL (Lamotrigine) in the Treatment of a Major Depressive Episode in Patients with Type I Bipolar Disorder" }]
Statistical Analysis Plan
Publication Citation
sdfg
sdf
To help us verify your identity, a validation code will be sent to you.
Phone Number (By providing your phone number, you agree to receive text messages. Message and data rates may apply.)
Email Address (Code will be sent via email. If you don't see the email in your inbox, please check your spam folder.)
Enter code here