Just a moment, the page is loading...
Browse All Studies
View List of Selected Studies and choose next steps >
Clear All Studies
Close
Login | Create Account
About Us
Data Sponsors
For Researchers ▼
Researchers Perspective
How It Works
Data Sharing Agreement
FAQs
Independent Review Panel
Metrics ▼
Metrics Overview
Agreed Proposals
Published Proposals
Help/Contact Us
Validity of Renal Transplant Outcomes in the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry: Comparison with Clinical Trials Data
Proposal
10204
Title of Proposed Research
Validity of Renal Transplant Outcomes in the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry: Comparison with Clinical Trials Data
Lead Researcher
Tracey Ying
Affiliation
Employer: Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia Research Affiliation: University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Funding Source
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Data Sharing Agreement Date
24 June 2020
Lay Summary
The Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) routinely collects important information about what happens to people with kidney transplants. The ANZDATA registry is an important research tool to help clinicians improve practice with an aim to improve patient care. The accuracy of the data obtained by the registry is unclear and requires assessment.Kidney transplant recipients often enter clinical trials, which provides top quality data for evidence-based medicine. Strategies and interventions such as standard operating procedures, personnel training, and data monitoring are implemented in clinical trials to reduce error. International and national guidelines also stipulate for data quality and assurance. Thus, clinical outcomes captured in clinical trials is universally accepted as the gold-standard.To assess the accuracy of the ANZDATA registry for important outcomes such as kidney survival, the aim of this study is to compare the outcomes collected by the ANZDATA registry to the outcomes collected by patients enrolled in a clinical trial.
Study Data Provided
[{ "PostingID": 4137, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CRAD001A2309", "Description": "Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing Concentration-controlled Everolimus in Two Doses (1.5 and 3.0 mg/Day Starting Doses) With Reduced Cyclosporine Versus 1.44 g Mycophenolic Acid (as Sodium Salt) With Standard Dose Cyclosporine in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients" },{ "PostingID": 19847, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CRAD001A2433", "Description": "A 24 Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Safety and Efficacy Study of Concentration-controlled Everolimus With Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor vs Mycophenolate With Standard Calcineurin Inhibitor in de Novo Renal Transplantation" }]
Statistical Analysis Plan
Publication Citation
To help us verify your identity, a validation code will be sent to you.
Phone Number (By providing your phone number, you agree to receive text messages. Message and data rates may apply.)
Email Address (Code will be sent via email. If you don't see the email in your inbox, please check your spam folder.)
Enter code here