Just a moment, the page is loading...
Browse All Studies
View List of Selected Studies and choose next steps >
Clear All Studies
Close
Login | Create Account
About Us
Data Sponsors
For Researchers ▼
Researchers Perspective
How It Works
Data Sharing Agreement
FAQs
Independent Review Panel
Metrics ▼
Metrics Overview
Agreed Proposals
Published Proposals
Help/Contact Us
Statistical methods for estimating the duration of protection of malaria vaccines: secondary analysis of data from the RTSS/AS02A trial in Mozambique.
Proposal
1016
Title of Proposed Research
Statistical methods for estimating the duration of protection of malaria vaccines: secondary analysis of data from the RTSS/AS02A trial in Mozambique.
Lead Researcher
Paul Milligan
Affiliation
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
London, UK
Funding Source
None
Potential Conflicts of Interest
None
Data Sharing Agreement Date
17 October 2014
Lay Summary
Malaria vaccines are unlikely to give long-lasting protection, booster doses will be required to maintain the high levels of antibodies and cellular responses that are required to maintain a moderate degree of protection. Unfortunately there is no immunological marker that can reliably be used to determine if a child is protected, the duration of protection and hence the interval between booster doses must therefore be determined from analysis of the incidence of malaria in vaccinated and unvaccinated children, from clinical trial cohorts, or in phase 4 studies in areas where the vaccine has been introduced, using case control studies, but there is no established methodology for these analyses and the methods commonly used have known biases. The purpose of this project is to develop statistical methods that can be used to estimate the duration of protection. Data from the phase 2b trial of the RTSS/AS02A vaccine in Mozambique will be used as the motivating example, to develop and evaluate the methods, and to demonstrate the use of the methods. In this trial children were randomized to receive malaria vaccine or rabies vaccine and kept under malaria surveillance until month 42, published analyses indicate efficacy may have waned gradually during this period, the long period of follow-up, large sample size, and evidence of vaccine protection that seems to wane over time, makes this a very suitable dataset for this purpose. The results of this work will be published in peer-reviewed journals and if the methods are successful they will be made available to malaria researchers via software modules in Stata.
Study Data Provided
[{ "PostingID": 1998, "Title": "GSK-257049/026", "Description": "A study to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals’ candidate malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS02A, administered intramuscularly according to a 0, 1 and 2 month vaccination schedule in toddlers and children aged 1 to 4 years in a malaria-endemic region of Mozambique.
Medicine: SB257049, Condition: Malaria, Phase: 2, Clinical Study ID: 257049/026, Sponsor: GSK" },{ "PostingID": 1999, "Title": "GSK-104297", "Description": "An open study for a 2-year period to confirm the safety and immunogenicity of the candidate malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS02A in Mozambican children aged 1 to 4 years at the time of first vaccine dose.
Medicine: SB257049, Condition: Malaria, Phase: 2, Clinical Study ID: 104297, Sponsor: GSK" }]
Statistical Analysis Plan
The statistical analysis plan will be added after the research is published.
Publication Citation
The publication citation will be added after the research is published.
To help us verify your identity, a validation code will be sent to you.
Phone Number (By providing your phone number, you agree to receive text messages. Message and data rates may apply.)
Email Address (Code will be sent via email. If you don't see the email in your inbox, please check your spam folder.)
Enter code here