Just a moment, the page is loading...
Browse All Studies
View List of Selected Studies and choose next steps >
Clear All Studies
Close
Login | Create Account
About Us
Data Sponsors
For Researchers ▼
Researchers Perspective
How It Works
Data Sharing Agreement
FAQs
Independent Review Panel
Metrics ▼
Metrics Overview
Agreed Proposals
Published Proposals
Help/Contact Us
Validation study on magnitude of tumorshrinkage as a prognostic marker
Proposal
675
Title of Proposed Research
Validation study on magnitude of tumorshrinkage as a prognostic marker
Lead Researcher
Viktor Grünwald
Affiliation
Medical School Hannover
Hannover, Germany
Funding Source
none
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Consultancy: GSK, Pfizer, Novartis, Astellas, Mologen, Bayer
Lectures: GSK, Pfizer, Novartis, Astellas, Bayer
Data Sharing Agreement Date
17 October 2014
Lay Summary
Since the introduction of targeted therapies for cancer treatment the role of objective response rate (ORR) has been questioned for its clinical relevance. We recently published the lack of correlation between ORR and prognosis in a retrospective series in mRCC (Busch et al. European Journal Cancer 2013; doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.10.017). However, tumor shrinkage of at least 10% occurring within 3 months of treatment has been associated with over all survival (OS) in another retrospective series by our group (Seidel C. et al. (2013). Br J Cancer doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.662).
In order to explore whether the extent of tumor shrinkage correlates with distinct clinical outcomes, we investigated this question in a Pfizer pooled clinical trial population of mRCC treated in 1st or 2nd line with various agents. A total of 2749 pts. have been analyzed for that purpose. Pts were characterized by maximal tumor shrinkage from baseline (-100% to <-60%, =60% to <-30%, =-30% to <0%, =0 to <+20%, =+20%). Kaplan Meier (K-M) plots have been used for OS estimates and a Cox proportional hazard analysis with 6 months landmark showed its role as an independent prognostic marker (Grünwald et al. ESMO 2013 #2702). If validated, this finding could set a benchmark for early clinical trial endpoints in mRCC.
The aim of the current study is to validate these findings by K-M plots and Cox-proportional hazard analysis (6 mo. landmark) with data from the COMPARZ trial. Furthermore, the role of tumor shrinkage at 3 months will be assessed as a putative early endpoint in clinical trials. Because the depth of remission has been shown to be a prognostic factor in our analysis, COMPARZ provides the only prospective data with head to head comparison of sunitinib and pazopanib. Despite the similar ORR for these agents, their ability to induce deep remission remains unknown.
Study Data Provided
[{ "PostingID": 4164, "Title": "NOVARTIS-VEG105192", "Description": "A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo controlled, Multi-center Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pazopanib (GW786034) Compared to Placebo in Patients with Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Medicine: pazopanib, Condition: Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Phase: 3, Clinical Study ID: VEG105192, Sponsor: Novartis" }]
Statistical Analysis Plan
The statistical analysis plan will be added after the research is published.
Publication Citation
The publication citation will be added after the research is published.
To help us verify your identity, a validation code will be sent to you.
Phone Number (By providing your phone number, you agree to receive text messages. Message and data rates may apply.)
Email Address (Code will be sent via email. If you don't see the email in your inbox, please check your spam folder.)
Enter code here